1. World problems
  2. Mediocrity of government leaders

Mediocrity of government leaders

  • Incompetence of parliamentarians
  • Politicians' lack of character
  • Shortage of qualified government officials

Nature

Government leadership in democracies or totalitarian states tends toward the mediocre. They are incapable of inspiring, or administrating, leading or managing. The selection processes eliminate those who can inspire and manage. In western democracies the values of selecting candidates by parties are governed by advertising considerations, such as, being photogenic and being acceptable culturally, religiously and ethnically and by political considerations, such as, party loyalty and size of power base within the party. Leadership qualities are not very important. In totalitarian systems of government, the selection process are either bureaucratic or violent neither of which tend to result in great leaders.

Incidence

Ethnic frictions which have dominated the political agenda in post-communist eastern Europe, call into question the calibre of the new leaders, particularly in Yugoslavia and the new Baltic states of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.

Broader

Mediocrity
Yet to rate

Narrower

Aggravates

Political apathy
Presentable

Aggravated by

Corruption
Excellent

Strategy

Value

Shortage
Yet to rate
Self-government
Yet to rate
Mediocrity
Yet to rate
Lack
Yet to rate
Incompetence
Yet to rate
Government
Yet to rate
Competence
Yet to rate
Character
Yet to rate

SDG

Sustainable Development Goal #10: Reduced InequalitySustainable Development Goal #16: Peace and Justice Strong Institutions

Metadata

Database
World problems
Type
(F) Fuzzy exceptional problems
Subject
  • Societal problems » Scarcity
  • Government » Government
  • Government » Parliament
  • Government » Officials
  • Government » Politics
  • Psychology » Psychology
  • Content quality
    Yet to rate
     Yet to rate
    Language
    English
    Last update
    Dec 3, 2024