strategy

Coordinating intergovernmental organizations

Synonyms:
Managing intergovernmental organizations
Context:
International organizations, and particularly the United Nations, were at the center of attention and apparent height of efficacy in the late 1980s and the early 1990s. In the following years expectations for a resurgence of multilateralism faded and international organizations, and particularly the United Nations, are now facing a crisis of credibility and even of legitimacy.

The legitimacy of intergovernmental organizations has always been viewed as secondary and weaker compared to the legitimacy of states. As a condition of the international system this in itself is not surprising: international organizations are derivated organizations, created by states, and states remain the primary actors of international politics. They are, however, constantly challenged - theoretically and practically - and their right to exist in their current form is increasingly questioned. One can easily recognize both the shortcomings and the validity of a number of criticisms leveled at international organizations.

Yet the growing sense of global integration and the unavoidable need for multilateral arrangements points to a continuing relevance for international organizations. The evolution of international affairs presents an increased need for cooperation and regulation between states on the basis of deepening interaction and pressures to collectively manage common issues. The international community also reflects a growing global ethos which speaks in favour of the need for legitimacy in international organizations, of its renewal on the basis of existing principles but also on the basis of new needs.

Type Classification:
D: Detailed strategies
Related UN Sustainable Development Goals:
GOAL 16: Peace and Justice Strong Institutions