Negative economic repercussions of disarmament


Disarmament would raise both general problems of maintaining the over-all level of economic activity and employment; and specific problems in so far as manpower or productive capacity might require adaptation to non-military needs.

There are some aspects of the process of disarmament which would raise problems significantly different from those that have been experienced in the usual process of economic growth. While many of the continuous changes in the composition of demand work themselves out only over a long period of time, it seems reasonable to assume that disarmament, once decided upon, would occur more rapidly. For some components of military demand, the whole of the shift might occur within a very short period of time such as a single year.

The reallocation of resources attendant upon disarmament would therefore pose some special problems. Even with the successful maintenance of total effective demand during a period of disarmament, significant problems of adjustment would remain in specific sectors and areas of the economy. Part of the personnel released by the armed forces and the armaments industry would have to be trained or retrained so as to permit absorption into peacetime occupations. Some plant and equipment would have to be converted. Productive capacity might contract in some industries, and might have to be expanded in others. Where the manufacture of armaments has been concentrated in particular regions, it would be necessary either to shift resources out of those regions to other areas of growing demand, or alternatively to undertake schemes of redevelopment. The necessary steps would have to be taken to modify the direction of research and of technological development. Some less developed countries (dependent on exports of a few raw materials and commodities) might suffer economically from a sudden reduction in demand, a closing down of military bases, or the rapid sale of raw material reserves.

Counter Claim:

The main civilian purposes for which the freed resources, whether domestic or foreign in origin, could be applied are: raising standards of personal consumption of goods and services; expanding or modernizing agricultural and industrial productive capacity; promoting housing construction, urban renewal, including slum clearance, and rural development; promoting and expanding facilities for education, health, welfare, social security, cultural development and scientific research. Nuclear disarmament alone is the most necessary and has the most readily manageable economic consequences. Much of the physical plant and all of the scientists and technicians are needed for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.

Broader Problems:
Total disarmament
Problem Type:
F: Fuzzy exceptional problems
Date of last update
05.08.2015 – 01:35 CEST