Capitalism
- Competitive capitalism
- Overdependence on capital
- Western-led capitalism
- Failed capitalist economic system
- Inefficencies of capitalism
Nature
Capitalism is an economic and social system, the main attributes of which are:
- dominance of commodity-money relations and private property in the means of production;
- developed social division of labour;
- increasing socialization of production; and
- transformation of labour power into a commodity.
The shaping of the globe into a single, coherent system built on exploitation is the direct consequence of the pursuit of the valorization of capital. The current catastrophic state of the world system is a product of both the exigencies of the idealization of capital and the degrees of resistance to it encountered or engendered in the course of the history of the modern period. Since its inception, the capitalist system has combined the pursuit of capitalism with unrestrained geographical expansion. It is this physical, and, where deemed necessary, militarily aggressive, conquest that has given capitalism its world-wide systemic character.
In its process of development, monopoly capitalism evolves into state monopoly capitalism, which is characterized by the interlocking of the financial oligarchy with the upper echelons of the bureaucracy, the increased role of the state in all spheres of social life, the growth of the state sector in the economy, and increasingly active policies aimed at mitigating the socioeconomic contradictions of capitalism. When associated with imperialism, this engenders a profound crisis in bourgeois democracy, an intensification of reactionary tendencies, and the increased role of force in domestic and foreign policy. It is inseparable from the growth of militarism and military expenditures, the arms race, and tendencies towards the unleashing of aggressive wars.
Incidence
At the national level, the tendency of competitive capitalism to reduce competition has been countered by anti-trust laws. The tendency to exploit labour has been constrained by regulation of working conditions. The tendency to exclude has been constrained by social welfare programmes. The tendency to deceive has been constrained by advertising laws and consumer protection legislation. The tendency to externalize environmental costs has been constrained by environmental protection regulations. But these achievements at the national level are increasingly undermined by the globalization of of competitive capitalism through which these same problems are now bypassing national constraints and re-emerging at the global level.
The capitalist world-system is not confined to those parts of the globe which can formally be designated as the capitalist countries. Some observers see the existing socialist countries as part of the capitalist world-system to the extent either that their internal organization follows capitalist criteria of efficiency and/or they participate in the world economy on terms set by capitalist competition and the law of value. In this sense they are not only victims of those ominous military, ecological and social developments and threats propelled by the dictates of capitalist accumulation, but they also bear their due proportion of responsibility for hampering social transformation. The deterioration of the conditions under which the mass of the population has to live in many areas of the world, the increase in conflicts between and within countries, the intensification of the world economic crisis, are demonstrating that unequal and uneven development, with all the forms of immiseration and alienation which it creates, cannot be surmounted within the capitalist world-system. The extent of the problem has been highlighted within the USA itself by a report from a conference of Catholic bishops stating that the distribution of income and wealth in the USA is so inequitable that it violates minimum standards of distributive justice. In 1982 the richest 20% of Americans received more income than the bottom 70% combined.
Claim
Capitalism emphasizes limitless increases in consumption and waste, disregard for the poor, and indifference to any concept of appropriate development. The capitalist system is under severe attack from victims of inequality, alienation, racism, sexism, irrationality, and imperialism, who are struggling to free themselves from oppression and are learning that capitalism is one of their main enemies. The very existence of such challenges proves that capitalism is neither a smoothly operating system nor a system unsusceptible to change. The histories of capitalist systems give numerous instances of resistance from those whom capitalism has sought to subordinate. Often this resistance has been overcome only through the use of violence and coercion. The apparent vitality of capitalist economies is illusory in that it obscures recognition of the progressive devitalization of those sectors and countries on which that vitality depends for its resources.
Everything that humans currently need to live is locked up tightly under the control of investors who accumulate capital, namely people who can deny everyone else access to "survival goods". Because they have this power, they can force as many people as market conditions will allow to work for them, at rates they set low enough to allow them to profit from their investments. This is also true if the state does the investing and controls the capital. The owners and controllers of capital monopolize the production of virtually everything useful or enjoyable, otherwise known as "goods and services". This monopolization creates two classes of people: capitalists and workers. Workers alone produce wealth, and employment thus becomes an evolved form of slavery.
In the 1980s capitalism triumphed over communism. In the 1990s it triumphed over democracy (David Korten).
It is easier for most people to imagine the end of the world than to imagine the end of capitalism.
Despite their differences over the secular state and democratic norms, both conservatives and liberals uphold the corporate capitalist system. Even religious extremists opposed to US military and political power and Western culture are not averse to partaking in the global economy and Western technology to achieve their political goals. However, when capitalism is unquestioningly accepted as sacrosanct, it becomes a form of economic fundamentalism.
Counter-claim
Capitalism is intended to serve the unique goals and needs of individuals. Throughout the history of capitalism, that individual goal has usually been upward social mobility. Essential to the achievement of all the different personal goals is the individual freedom that capitalism provides in greater measure than any other system of economic organization.
Capitalism is an exceedingly broad and somewhat vague term, covering societies as variously organized as Sweden, UK, Japan, France and the USA, in each of which the mixture of public and private enterprise, the legal rules governing the pursuit of profit, the approved market structure, the permitted accumulation of income and wealth, differs significantly from all the others.
The unjust nature of the global economy and the inappropriateness of development can be explained by the exploitative nature of exchange, market forces and distributive effects between nations and classes. However, these effects are only incidentally due to capitalism. They occurred under other imperial systems before capitalism emerged, and even if all nations were suddenly to become socialist they would still participate in a global market system with the very same distributive effects that currently produce underdevelopment.
The collapse of the USSR has given the clearest proof that capitalism organizes the material affairs of humanity more satisfactorily than socialism: that however inequitably or irresponsibly the marketplace may distribute goods, it does so better than the queues of a planned economy; however mindless the culture of commercialism, it is more attractive than state moralism; and however deceptive the ideology of a business civilization, it is more believable than that of a socialist one.