Strengthening anti-trust laws
- Implementing international anti-trust legislation
- Regulating economic competition practices
- Implementing competition policy
Description
Competition policy refers to the removal or control of government measures and private business practices that limit the contestibility of markets i.e. that allow incumbent firms to sustain monopolistic behaviour over an extended period of time. The aim of competition policy is to remove, or prevent, barriers to entry or exit in specific domestic markets.
Implementation
Following the Singapore Ministerial Meeting in 1996, a WTO Working Group on the interaction between Trade and Competition Policy was established to explore the relationships between the two types of policy. It continues to meet but differences of view exist within it. The main proposal in this area, which has been put forward for inclusion in the New Round Agenda is for the development of a multilateral framework of competition rules. This is supported by the European Commission. It may be regarded as a horizontal measure in the sense that its implementation could have implications for the implementation of a number of other measures, and the impacts these may have (e.g. the proposed multilateral framework agreement relating to investment and proposed changes in trade defence instruments, such as anti-dumping measures.
The European Union (EU) supports negotiations within WTO on a framework of multilateral rules on competition. This framework would include the following elements: 1. core principles and common rules relating to the adoption of a competition law, and its enforcement; 2. common base line disciplines to be applied to anti-competitive practices with a significant impact on international trade and investment (e.g. 'hard-core' cartels); 3. provisions on international co-operation, which could include provisions on notification, consultation and surveillance in relation to anti-competitive practices with an international dimension, and exchanges of non-confidential information. It could also incorporate concepts of negative and positive comity (while not imposing a binding obligation to investigate on behalf of another country); and 4. application of WTO disputes settlement adapted to the specifics of competition law. The basic function of dispute settlement would be to ensure that domestic competition law and enforcement structures are in accordance with the provisions agreed internationally. The EU proposals exclude practices of purely domestic significance, do not refer to anti-dumping, and do not specify target dates.