Choosing public investments
- Designing a public investment plan
Context
Preparing and updating a public investment programme can seen as a matter of screening, projects being accepted if they meet satisfactory appraisal criteria at appropriate stages in their life cycle. New investment alternatives include both projects with detailed designs already worked out and those which are rough ideas needing further investigation. Projects at early stages of development would receive a less detailed screening while firm proposals for new projects would be subject to full-scale economic analysis before construction begins. Currently ongoing projects, whether funded by foreign aid or not, would not be exempt from continued economic scrutiny simply because costs have already been incurred, since their economic rationale may disappear as conditions change.
In practice, because many core and spending ministries lack the capability to appraise projects thoroughly, economic criteria are often neglected. Other considerations may take precedence over economic return: the power of interest groups, tied financing, the desire for prestige projects, unwillingness to write off sunk costs and stop bad projects, ministerial lobbying, corruption, inertia.
Claim
Costly mistakes can be avoided by requiring that a (possibly centralized) team carries out a simple and consistent project appraisal for every major project (including those of state-owned enterprises and subnational levels of government) - and by adopting procedures that ensure the results receive attention.
Broader
Narrower
Facilitates
Facilitated by
SDG
Metadata
Database
Global strategies
Type
(F) Exceptional strategies
Subject
Content quality
Yet to rate
Language
English
Last update
Dec 3, 2024