1. World problems
  2. Religious discrimination in the administration of justice

Religious discrimination in the administration of justice

  • Active religious prejudice in court

Nature

In some countries admission to the judiciary or some parts thereof is limited, either by law or in practice, to persons belonging to a particular religion. Where the law requires the taking of an oath by judges (upon their taking office), or by jurors, assessors or lawyers (before acting) this, as such, discriminates against those who object to taking oaths, on religious grounds, and those who profess no religion, to the extent that the formula for the oath is incompatible with their beliefs.

Similarly, where the law requires the taking of an oath before giving evidence in court, a person who objects to taking oaths in a manner which he deems to be incompatible with his religious or non-religious beliefs may be impeded in his defence in criminal proceedings or in presenting his case in civil or administrative matters. An accused or a litigant may similarly suffer if one of his witnesses or an interpreter who is to assist him is under the same disadvantage.

Broader

Narrower

Aggravates

Anti-clericalism
Yet to rate

Aggravated by

Related

Value

Prejudice
Yet to rate
Nonreligious
Yet to rate
Justice
Yet to rate
Injustice
Yet to rate

SDG

Sustainable Development Goal #10: Reduced InequalitySustainable Development Goal #16: Peace and Justice Strong Institutions

Metadata

Database
World problems
Type
(E) Emanations of other problems
Subject
  • Law » Tribunals, courts
  • Management » Administration
  • Religious practice » Religion
  • Content quality
    Presentable
     Presentable
    Language
    English
    Last update
    Oct 4, 2020