strategy
Using cost benefit analysis tools for biodiversity impact assessment
Synonyms:
Employing business cost benefit analysis procedures for biological resource conservation Description:
Developing where feasible cost-effectiveness analyses of relevant strategies, plans, programmes, policies and projects affecting biodiversity. Context:
In principle, it should be possible through cost benefit analysis to place values upon any of the impacts made on the environment by economic development. In practice, it is not always possible to quantify the value of improvements or losses to the environment. Moreover, it is not always obvious what the environmental impact of a decision will be, even in physical terms.Environmental impact assessments usually identify mitigation measures to potential problems. It is desirable to identify levels of acceptable risk, or state of biodiversity that is considered undesirable. Such limits could be either expressed in biological terms (e.g. percentage of biomass below which a given species should not be driven) or in economic terms (e.g. minimum profitability from tourism or fisheries).
Decision-makers and users of biological resources should be guided by economic approaches which assess the full social and environmental costs and benefits of projects, plans and policies that impact upon biodiversity, and which internalise costs borne to the environment and to society. These should reflect both the economic loss that results when biodiversity is degraded or lost, as well as the value gained from conserving the resource.
Subjects:
Fundamental Sciences → AnalyticsResources → Resources
Biosciences → Biology
Social Activity → Employers
Social Activity → Welfare
Commerce → Assessment
Commerce → Purchasing, supplying
Commerce → Business enterprises
Industry → Metal products
Cybernetics → Cybernetics
Conservation → Conservation
Type Classification:
E: Emanations of other strategies Related UN Sustainable Development Goals:
