Integrating population programmes in environment and development plans

Applying responsible stewardship of human fertility
Reviewing integration of population programmes in sustainable development plans
National population policy goals and programmes are set and implemented which are consistent with national environment and development plans for sustainability, and in keeping with individual freedom, dignity and personally held values.
Sustainable development aims at improving human well-being, particularly through alleviating poverty, increasing gender equity, and improving health, human resources and stewardship of the natural environment. Because demographic factors are closely linked to these goals, strategies that take population into account have a better chance of success.

One of the basic conclusions of the Global Science Panel on Population and Environment, an independent body of experts organized by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population and the United Nations University is that the Johannesburg Earth Summit must heed the first principle of the 1992 Rio Declaration -- that "human beings are at the centre of concern for sustainable development" -- by taking full account of how population and society interact with the natural environment.

The [International Conference on Population and Development] in Cairo in 1994 recognized that population policy should be oriented towards improving social conditions and expanding choices for individuals. The key recognition was that focusing on people -- their rights, capabilities and opportunities -- would have multiple benefits for individuals, for societies and for their sustainable relationship with the environment. Therefore, in Johannesburg, consideration of sustainable-development policies must include population growth and distribution, mobility, health impacts of environmental change, differential vulnerability and the empowerment of people, especially of women.

Fertility decline in high-fertility countries, by slowing population growth, can make many environmental problems easier to solve. It can also have important economic benefits through reducing the number of children relative to the working-age population, creating a unique opportunity to increase investments in health, education, infrastructure and environmental protection.

In high-income countries, the environmental impact of population growth and distribution must be considered jointly with high consumption rates. Even in countries where little growth is envisioned, unsustainable patterns of consumption have global implications for the environment and human well-being, and must be addressed with appropriate policies.

Hence, on the way from Rio to Johannesburg we must go through Cairo. Two key policies are needed: first, investment in voluntary family planning and reproductive-health programmes; and second, education and empowerment, especially of women, in order to reduce fertility, enhance individual choice, contribute to greater environmental awareness and reduce vulnerability to environmental changes.

This strategy features in the framework of Agenda 21 as formulated at UNCED (Rio de Janeiro, 1992), now coordinated by the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development and implemented through national and local authorities. Agenda 21 recommends that national reviews are conducted and the integration of population policies in national development and environment strategies is monitored nationally.

Total resources, national as well as external, currently devoted to population activities in developing countries are estimated to be US$ 4,500 million a year. Of that amount, nearly 80% is provided by developing countries themselves. To carry out intensified programmes, and implement integrated population/environment action in line with Agenda 21 activities, an average of US$ 7,000 million is needed annually in the 1993-2000 period, of which about half is required from international sources. The goal is to mobilize US$ 9,000 million a year by the turn of the century. About US$ 6 million annually is needed to strengthen international institutions.
If we do not put the human population at the core of the sustainable-development agenda, our efforts to improve human well-being and preserve the quality of the environment will fail.
Type Classification:
G: Very Specific strategies