strategy

Taxing batteries

Synonyms:
Applying ecotax to disposable batteries
Enforcing take-back schemes for batteries
Recycling batteries
Applying battery-recovery mandates
Charging advance-disposal fees for batteries
Implementation:

In 1998, more than 20 countries required "take-back" and recycling of used batteries. However, a 1999 report found that while a number of countries, such as the Netherlands, require a 90% recovery rate for nickel cadmium (Ni-Cd) rechargeable batteries, none has been able to recover more than 60%. Moreover, as fast as manufacturers can set up a recovery scheme for Ni-Cd's, manufacturers are turning to lithium ion and nickel metal hydride batteries -- not considered "hazardous" and require no take-back in most areas.

Draft amendments to the EU Batteries Directive would require 75% recovery of all household batteries. It would also ban cadmium batteries, which would require costly re-tooling for a number of firms making power tools, camcorders and other small appliances.

Switzerland's law requires advance disposal fees on Ni-Cd batteries, equal to around $0.13 per battery. If a recovery rate of 80% is not achieved within six years, deposits will be required. The most stringent countries in Europe and Asia are implementing takeback requirements for all batteries, even though only ni-cd and lead acid batteries have any genuine toxics in them.

Collection and recovery of batteries is not cheap. US manufacturers pay about $7 million per year for a national collection and public education campaign but manage to collect and recover only a fraction of ni-cd batteries. In 2001, San Francisco passed a resolution recommending new local "producer responsibility" legislation for household batteries, claiming industry has not collected enough volumes in its national recycling programme (and less than 1% in the district).

A number of Latin American countries have moved to ban imports of hazardous wastes under the Basel Ban Amendments – but this is causing some intra-market distortions, according to "Recycling & Solid Waste in Latin America, 2002 Update" published last week by Raymond Communications, Inc. Brazilian companies could not export the material to Argentina for recycling at an authorized Ni-Cd battery recycler because of hazardous wastes import bans under the Basel Convention Amendments. Thus, the batteries must be shipped to France.

Claim:

The purpose of the tax is to ensure separation of the waste stream of batteries from other domestic waste. Ecotaxes would not be necessary if industry sets up and finances a deposit refund system that enable it to valorize the collected batteries without government intervention.

Counter Claim:

As fast as manufacturers can set up a recovery scheme for ni-cd's, manufacturers are turning to lithium ion and nickel metal hydride batteries – not considered "hazardous" and require no take-back in most areas.

Type Classification:
G: Very Specific strategies
Related UN Sustainable Development Goals:
GOAL 12: Responsible Consumption and ProductionGOAL 16: Peace and Justice Strong Institutions