Proliferation of sports utility vehicles
Name(s):
Increasing numbers of family trucks and off-road vehicles
Nature
Sports utility vehicles (SUV) are a danger on the roads because their size and weight and design differ too greatly from the average car. In collisions between cars and utility vehicles, the occupants of cars are more likely to suffer injury. They are a danger to the environment because they consume more petrol and produce more pollutants than the average car.
Because of their designation as "trucks" for regulatory purposes, SUVs have escaped not only the more stringent fuel-efficiency standards applied to ordinary passenger cars but also the safety provisions. Crucial is that SUVs are not subject to the same bumper-height standards that apply to ordinary cars, so in a collision, the SUV often overrides the car it hits, often with fatal consequences for those in the car. Less well known is that SUVs are actually more dangerous for their occupants than ordinary cars - the rate of fatal injuries is actually a bit higher in SUVs than in ordinary cars. This is due to the propensity of SUVs to overturn in circumstances that would leave an ordinary car upright. Worse still, for the SUV users, is that while ordinary cars must protect their occupants during rollovers, SUVs are not required to do so, and most do not. It is the rollover wrecks that make SUVs so dangerous for their occupants.
Background
SUVs (technically off-road vehicles and legally a category of truck) are the largest private passenger vehicles ever built for the road. The worst of them get as little as 12 miles/gallon (roughly 20 litres/100 km) of fuel. They weigh as much as three tons and are invariably equipped with the huge V-8 engines needed to provide swift acceleration in such a heavy vehicle. Most of these vehicles are equipped with four-wheel-drive, which is rarely actually used by their owners.
Incidence
Since 1990 sales of sports utility vehicles have increased more than 60 per cent. Trucks and sports utility vehicles (SUVs) spew 30 percent more carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons and 75 percent more nitrous oxides than ordinary cars. SUV sales are encouraged by extremely low gasoline prices.
Claim
1. Highway fatalities in the USA were actually in decline before SUVs came into vogue, even though Americans were driving farther. This is true largely for one simple reason: the seatbelt. Seatbelt usage rose from 14 percent in 1984 to 73 percent in 2001. But do not help if you collide with an SUV. Not surprisingly, in 2002, for the first time in a decade, the number of highway deaths actually rose.
2. The real reasons that people buy SUVs are more sinister: these huge vehicles intimidate drivers in ordinary cars. perceive the SUV as a way to protect themselves. Most people who buy these things know on some level that they unnecessarily endanger others on the road, but these misanthropes care so little about the health and well-being of their fellow man that they choose to drive a vehicle that poses a large threat to other road users, in the hope that they will themselves be safer. The final irony is that they endanger themselves in the bargain. What is the future of a society in which this kind of behaviour is tolerated.
Counter-claim
Large sport utility vehicles provide excellent protection for their occupants.
Broader
Narrower
Aggravates
Value(s)
Reference(s)
Type
(E) Emanations of other problems