Absence of God

Name(s): 
Abandonment of the faithful
Nature

The existence of God is a subject of debate in theology and the philosophy of religion. A wide variety of arguments for and against the existence of God can be categorized as logical, empirical, metaphysical, subjective or scientific. In philosophical terms, the question of the existence of God involves the disciplines of epistemology (the nature and scope of knowledge) and ontology (study of the nature of being or existence) and the theory of value (since some definitions of God include "perfection").

The Western tradition of philosophical discussion of the existence of God began with Plato and Aristotle, who made arguments that today would be categorized as cosmological. Other arguments for the existence of God have been proposed by St. Anselm, who formulated the first ontological argument; Ibn Rushd (Averroes) and Thomas Aquinas, who presented their own versions of the cosmological argument (the kalam argument and the first way, respectively); René Descartes, who said that the existence of a benevolent God is logically necessary for the evidence of the senses to be meaningful. John Calvin argued for a sensus divinitatis, which gives each human a knowledge of God's existence. In philosophy, and more specifically in the philosophy of religion, atheism refers to the proposition that God does not exist. Some religions, such as Jainism, reject the possibility of a creator deity. Philosophers who have provided arguments against the existence of God include David Hume and Bertrand Russell.

Theism is the dominant view among philosophers of religion. In a 2020 PhilPapers survey, 69.50% of philosophers of religion stated that they accept or lean towards theism, while 19.86% stated they accept or lean towards atheism. Influential contemporary philosophers of religion who have defended theism include Alvin Plantinga, Yujin Nagasawa, and William Lane Craig, while those who have defended atheism include Graham Oppy, Paul Draper, and J. L. Mackie.

Source: Wikipedia

Claim 
This, according to religious psychology, is a condition in which the soul is either really (because of sin), or only apparently, forsaken by God. It is that experience in which it seems to a spiritual person that God has forsaken him. This spiritual abandonment may be a trial in which the spiritually advanced soul, feeling the need of a stronger possession of God, has the impression that God has deserted it and no longer holds it in His favour. In its less intense form, this abandonment leads to a feeling that God is far away; in its more intense form, it leads to a feeling of being rejected by God and destined to be lost. In the latter case this may lead to religiously-induced pathologies, aggravated by the secrecy in which the condition is maintained.
Broader 
Narrower 
Type 
(F) Fuzzy exceptional problems