Problem
Religious discrimination in the administration of justice
Other Names:
Active religious prejudice in court Nature:
In some countries admission to the judiciary or some parts thereof is limited, either by law or in practice, to persons belonging to a particular religion. Where the law requires the taking of an oath by judges (upon their taking office), or by jurors, assessors or lawyers (before acting) this, as such, discriminates against those who object to taking oaths, on religious grounds, and those who profess no religion, to the extent that the formula for the oath is incompatible with their beliefs.
Similarly, where the law requires the taking of an oath before giving evidence in court, a person who objects to taking oaths in a manner which he deems to be incompatible with his religious or non-religious beliefs may be impeded in his defence in criminal proceedings or in presenting his case in civil or administrative matters. An accused or a litigant may similarly suffer if one of his witnesses or an interpreter who is to assist him is under the same disadvantage.
Broader Problems:
Religious discriminationInequality before the lawUndue religious influence on secular life Narrower Problems:
Injustice of religious courts Related Problems:
Sectarian conflictReligious discrimination in politicsReligious discrimination in educationDiscriminatory religious influence on the law Aggravates:
InjusticeAnti-clericalismBanned religious sectsReligious intimidationUnderprivileged religious minorities Subject(s):
Law → Tribunals, courtsManagement → Administration
Religious Practice → Religion
Related UN Sustainable Development Goals:
Problem Type:
E: Emanations of other problems Date of last update
04.10.2020 – 22:48 CEST