The problems of crop protection have changed dramatically since 1945. There is now a whole arsenal of chemicals with which to combat agricultural pests and diseases, but this development has itself many drawbacks. Such sophisticated techniques are available only to a minority of farmers; in most parts of the world the standard of crop protection remains abysmally low. In addition, modern crop protection methods have been criticized for relying too heavily on chemical control. Biological controls, both natural and contrived, have been neglected. In some cases involving misuse of agricultural chemicals, crops must be protected from the very measures intended for their protection. Meanwhile previously localized pests and diseases continue to spread worldwide.
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations has published world figures which indicate that 35% of the wheat which could theoretically be harvested is lost as a result of pests and diseases. The corresponding figure for potatoes is 40%, for sugarbeet 24%, for apples 30%, for cotton 60% and for tobacco 62%. Even where modern methods of crop protection are employed, losses are still very heavy.
It was reported in 1992 that there is a link between stunted plant growth and higher ultra-violet radiation caused by the depletion of the Earth's protective ozone layer. Test plants were irradiated for six to eight weeks with 5 to 10 per cent more ultra-violet-B light, which is normally screened off by the ozone layer. Some of the crops declines were as much as 70 percent. The damage occured at molecular level, affecting the productive apparatus of the plants, because of an energy overload turning into heat which destroys proteins important for plant production. It was estimated that in reality some 20 percent more UV-B gets through during peak times.