Environmental consequences of war

Experimental visualization of narrower problems
Other Names:
Military disruption of the biosphere
Pollution from military activities
Degradation of the environment by armed conflict
War induced environmental destruction
Wars have a serious impact on the environment, ranging from neglect to deliberate destruction of crops and houses, and as in the case of the American war against the Vietnamese, destruction of forest ecosystems with broad-leaf herbicides which also have adverse effects on human health. Environmental consequences of current and past wars include: hazards from unexploded weapons; physical and biological effects of damage to soil and landscape; and human suffering resulting from the disruption of social systems. The effects would be most devastating in the case of nuclear warfare. The long-term effects of chemical and biological warfare on a large-scale remain to be determined.
Estimated air emissions from Kuwaiti oil fires in 1991 were 65 megatonnes of carbon. This is more than one percent of the total world emissions from fossil fuel combustion in 1990 (6,000 megatonnes). According to the National Science Foundation of the USA, the 737 burning oil wells were producing 2 million tonnes of carbon dioxide and 5,000 tonnes of soot each day. Regional temperatures were reported to be 10 to 15 degrees Centigrade lower than normal. Grazing animals were dying near Kuwait City from hydrocarbon-contaminated grass. Black rain and acid rain were falling in neighbouring Iran and reports occurred up to 3,500 kilometres distant, including the Indian Himalayas and Bulgaria. Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace claimed that the smoke could influence the temperature of the Indian Ocean, thus affecting monsoon rains and Indian harvests. Concern was also expressed for the effects of acid precipitation and soot on the 2.5 million hectares of semi-arid forest along the Persian Gulf and Sea of Oman. International scientists predicted an increase in lung cancers among Kuwait citizens in one or two decades.

One of the least publicised consequences of the Balkans conflict has been the massive release of toxic pollutants into the environment from the destruction of ammunition dumps and civil and military industrial instillations. An explosion in 1992 at an oil refinery at Sisak, south of Zagreb released 95,000 tones of crude oil and other pollutants into the surrounding area. A 500 mile oil slick ran from the refinery down the River Sava into the River Danube, causing major pollution to the Danube Delta. In another incident, the destruction of a chemicals factory at Osijek resulted int the release of over 100 tons of active ingredients for pesticides into the environment which subsequently filtrated into the Drava River, another tributary of the Danube. The amount of polyaromatic hydrocarbons, dioxins, PCBs and other heavy metals released into the environment during the conflict have caused significant destruction of wildlife and are now appearing as health results in people drawing water from the Drava, Sava and Danube Rivers.

Areas of the Falklands have been fenced off permanently because clearing the mine fields is not worth the risk and cost involved.

During the 1990s, the European Region experienced the disastrous effects of armed conflicts and serious civil disruption in Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Georgia, the province of Kosovo, the Russian Federation (Chechnya) and Tajikistan.

The war in central Africa fought for five years since 1993 is destroying the regions wildlife. Park officials of the Kahuzi-Biega park in The Democratic Republic of Congo estimate that 100 of the park's 250 lowland gorillas have been killed since 1996. Along with three quarters of the 400 forest elephants alive before the war. Arrested poachers have admitted to killing 20 gorillas and 17 elephants since April 1998. Before 1993 3000 tourists visited the the park each year and their contribution to the economy was vital in building schools roads and water projects for the population around the park. Without the tourists and the war the economy has plummetted, a consequence is that poaching has increased and elephant meat is popular as it is half the price of beef.

Civil conflict and war in Africa have also led to significant ecological damage and biodiversity losses in and outside protected areas, as well as to the marginalization of environmental management institutions and conservation programmes. By 1991, the wildlife populations of national parks and reserves in Angola had been reduced by civil war to only 10 per cent of their 1975 levels (Huntley and Matos 1992). Similar losses are likely to have occurred in the Great Lakes region during the past five years but have yet to be quantified.

Much of Japan's forests were destroyed in World War II. In the former Korea (before separation), forest resources were excessively removed during the last years of Japanese colonial rule and were severely damaged by the Korean War in 1950-53 (OECD 1997). War in Indochina during the 1960s and early 1970s was extremely detrimental: about 2 million ha of forest in Viet Nam were destroyed through bombing and spraying of defoliant (WCMC 1994) and the toxic after-effects of residual dioxin held back forest regeneration for several years, especially in mangrove areas. Similarly, there was substantial loss of forest cover in northern Laos due to bombing during the war (DAI 1995).

1. In Somalia, warlords sold rights to European firms to dump toxic waste; in a sense, one could consider this toxic warfare.
Problem Type:
C: Cross-sectoral problems
Date of last update
28.08.2000 – 00:00 CEST