Problem

Film and cinema censorship

Other Names:
Video censorship
Ban on videocassette recorders
Nature:

Restrictions on the public showing of films may be on the grounds of obscenity, nudity, violence, or general moral undesirability, including political undesirability. Video censorship may be employed in order to prevent children from watching programmes of questionable merit at home those with excessive violence or sex, for example. However, the notion of merit is subjective, thus video censorship may be seen as a significant threat to the principle of free speech in the arts and media.

Incidence:

Censorship may involve cutting out certain scenes or dialogue, or may mean that the whole film is banned. The most frequent method is classifying films in various levels of acceptability: universal acceptable, adults only, teenage children, children with an adult etc. It may either be refused a licence or classification, or be confiscated. Newsreels may be censored, as may also publicity photographs for films. The banning of films may lead to the growth of private film clubs and underground cinemas. If a banned film is shown publicly contrary to the law, the exhibitor may be imprisoned.

Claim:

Censorship of films leads to cultural stagnation.

Counter Claim:

We are filled with sorrow by the lowering in standards of modesty and purity during this generation caused by videos which, unfortunately, are a curse that have entered homes in Israel. VCRs should be kept out of homes, and not used at weddings, conferences or elsewhere.

Broader Problems:
Censorship
Values:
Banning
Censure
Problem Type:
D: Detailed problems
Date of last update
06.11.2017 – 19:12 CET