Problem

Unsafe hazardous waste disposal


Experimental visualization of narrower problems
Other Names:
Toxic waste sites
Improper dumping of toxic wastes
Nature:

As the amount of hazardous waste produced increases annually, places and methods of disposal that are scientifically, technologically, politically and environmentally safe are becoming more difficult both to discover and to agree upon. Many alarming events in the past decade have resulted from indiscriminate dumping of wastes. Wastes have been considered to be worthless, and so there has been little economic incentive to recover them, and, instead, considerable desire to dump them as quickly and cheaply as possible. But improper disposal may render a relatively harmless substance dangerous.

There are laws to control the use of the thousands of new chemicals put on the market each year, but there is little regulation over disposal. By-products and intermediate chemicals, created during the manufacturing process, usually end up in the wastes; these may be more chemically and biologically active than the finished products, and thus potentially more harmful in the environment. The notification schemes recently brought in by law do not cover wastes; their potential damage may go unrecognized. It is also physically difficult to screen wastes for toxicity because they are highly complicated mixtures of substances. If these wastes are exported for disposal or used for other purposes, they may do serious damage because people are unaware of the risks. Particularly vulnerable are the developing countries, because of relatively cheap prices, few environmental regulations, few people trained in necessary technology, corruption and poverty. In highly industrialized countries fragmented waste treatment laws, overlapping enforcement agencies and too few inspectors means that a significant amount of toxic waste is improperly treated.

Incidence:

Hazardous waste is about 10-20% of the world's manufacturing waste. Tens of millions of tonnes of toxic and otherwise hazardous substances enter the environment every year as unwanted wastes. The managing and disposing of this waste is a significant problem. Until recently, many hazardous wastes were disposed of without proper evaluation of the environmental consequences. There have been several hundred cases of contamination of wells by poisons from hazardous wastes - the most common of all the dangers to arise from improper waste disposal. These often occurred because the wastes were put into sand or gravel pits or old mine workings.

The USA generates 60 million tons of hazardous wastes a year; the EEC/EU generates approximately 20 to 30 million tonnes.

Claim:

Businesses treating toxic wastes range from highly reputable firms dealing with complex problems as responsibly as possible, to criminal organizations endangering millions of lives and destroying the environment. These questionable firms used a variety of quasi-legal and illegal practices in dealing with toxic substances. Bogus labels are placed on containers. Substances are mixed with non-toxic wastes and redefined. Waste is shipped to countries which have no idea what the substances are nor their impact on humans or the environment. They are burned at sea polluting it. In some cases waste is dumped overboard in full knowledge of the dangers.

Toxic waste dump sites must be cleaned up as they are a menace to society. In addition to the health hazards they pose, there are also intangible problems, such as loss of real estate value for homes neighbouring toxic waste dump sites. As these problems have largely resulted from industrial carelessness and shortsightedness, the bulk of the financing of the research, development, and implementation of clean-up efforts should come out of industrial taxes.

Counter Claim:

Due to the staggering magnitude of the problem, which includes prohibitive costs, numbers of sites, (in the USA alone, and estimated 10,000 sites need to be cleaned up), length of time involved, and inappropriate methodology, (again in the USA, methods to either move or cover over toxic dump sites have proved very costly and ineffective), there seem to be no definitive solutions to this problem. As controls on industrial toxic waste removal have become stricter, many large industries attempt to circumvent paying for cleanups by moving their operations or exporting their wastes abroad. The former situation results in valuable jobs and tax revenues leaving the home country; the latter situation renders developing countries (where waste removal laws are less strict) vulnerable to such pollution exports. Many smaller companies are being forced into bankruptcy when required clean up toxic waste dumps.

Problem Type:
D: Detailed problems
Related UN Sustainable Development Goals:
GOAL 7: Affordable and Clean Energy
Date of last update
21.05.2019 – 18:15 CEST