Uncoordinated social services in urban areas
Other Names: Proliferation of parallel urban services
Nature: Contemporary urban society has moved so decisively toward providing a network of social service agencies to cover the population's essential needs that people have come to depend upon their availability; yet these agencies frequently lack the coordination among themselves to serve a community effectively. Patchy knowledge of procedures, long waiting periods and confusing eligibility screening, combine to create the impression of structured isolation between agency and client, thereby increasing frustration. In the absence of regular inter-agency exchange, an individual agency lacks the total picture of the gaps and overlaps in available services which is necessary if it is to provide an adequate referral service. When a gap in services is pinpointed, expansion of services is hampered because of grant requirements which base funding on the number of people served: for example, a local drug clinic funded on the basis of the number of people in a methadone programme was blocked from expanding outreach programmes where funds were scarce. The service extended to recipients, in effect, became maintenance rather than rehabilitation.
Claim: Until agencies are able to coordinate plans for their service to the community their fragmentation will block effective delivery of services to the urban ghetto community.
Problem Type: F: Fuzzy exceptional problems
Date of last update 14.07.1996 – 00:00 CEST